Re: Thank you Hunter

Re: Thank you Hunter

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Message Board ]

Posted by [IP Address: 66.37.169.39] 'Hunter Praywell' on July 17, 2001 at 03:09:51 EST:

In Reply to: Thank you Hunter posted by [IP Address: 66.37.169.39] 'WJACKSON' on July 13, 2001 at 18:06:59 EST:

I believe PeopleSoft's matching handbook discusses this. IF all else fails, onsider building a custom match rule called 'MAXAMT' which would ignore PO Line quantity and match POs based on dollar amount invoiced, where you could keep applying invoices to a PO until the sum of the vouchers merchandise amounts would exceed the some of the po line merchandise amount, then assign this match rule to your POs.

We use that rule here, on POs that we don't receive on (Two Way) so we can keep applying vouchers to a PO until it's 'full'.

Let me know here if you need more info. on this.

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:
Subject:
Message: : I believe PeopleSoft's matching handbook discusses this. IF all else fails, onsider building a custom match rule called 'MAXAMT' which would ignore PO Line quantity and match POs based on dollar amount invoiced, where you could keep applying invoices to a PO until the sum of the vouchers merchandise amounts would exceed the some of the po line merchandise amount, then assign this match rule to your POs. : We use that rule here, on POs that we don't receive on (Two Way) so we can keep applying vouchers to a PO until it's 'full'. : Let me know here if you need more info. on this.